@triketora
Known affiliationi can tell who’s still using opus 5 for their linkedin cringe posts. please spare my eyeballs, opus 5.5 is here
negative· WritingRead original
Loading Pulse Check
Claude Opus 5
frontier modelby Anthropic
We collected 3 eligible posts, but not enough supported labels from different authors to summarise the conversation.
people talking
3
Distinct tracked authors
posts mentioning it
3
In the selected period
vs. the previous 24 hours
+200%
Observed 98% now, 100% prior
reported switching to it
—
Needs three supporting authors
Attention over time
Posts / hour01:1705:0009:0013:0017:0021:0001:00
Mentions in our tracked network, per hourStill collecting
Collection is incomplete. Breaks in the line are unobserved intervals, not zero mentions.
View interval counts
| Interval start (UTC) | Mentions | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 02:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 03:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 04:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 05:00 UTC | 1 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 06:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 07:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 08:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 09:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 10:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 11:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 12:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 13:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 14:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 15:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 16:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 17:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 18:00 UTC | 1 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 19:00 UTC | 0 | Partial |
| 2026-09-25 20:00 UTC | 0 | Partial |
| 2026-09-25 21:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 22:00 UTC | 1 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 23:00 UTC | 0 | Partial |
3 unobserved intervals omitted. We did not collect during them, so their counts are unknown, not zero.
What people are saying
Grounded in source postsGetting praise
No supported praise from at least three authors in this window.
Raising concerns
No supported concerns from at least three authors in this window.
Tone of the conversation
Not enough classified posts for a breakdown. Percentages need at least 10 labelled posts from 5 authors.
- Posts labelled
- 3 of 3
- Collection coverage
- 98%
How this is put together
Public posts from the accounts Tech Twitter monitors, in the selected window. Findings need three supporting authors and a published source. Announcements can cite one known-affiliated account. This is a sample of the conversation, not a survey or a measure of adoption.
The posts behind the picture
Public source posts
@prathkum
Holy shit, Claude Opus 5.5 is now up to 40% cheaper than Opus 5. Same tasks. Same quality. Way less cost. Breakdown: Input tokens: $4/M (down 20%) Output tokens: $20/M (down 20%) Cache reads: $0.20/M (down 60%) Most of a coding session's cost comes from cache reads, so this alone can cut your bill by more than half. AI is slowly getting cheaper.
neutral· PricingRead original
@theo
There's definitely a weird, intangible vibe that I kind of miss from Fable. Opus is great to work with. Really smart, thorough, probably even better than Fable in most ways. But I still find myself missing "something". Hard to explain exactly what "something" is here...
positive· Overall capabilityRead original