Finding signal on Twitter is more difficult than it used to be. We curate the best tweets on topics like AI, startups, and product development every weekday so you can focus on what matters.
We collected 6 eligible posts, but not enough supported labels from different authors to summarise the conversation.
people talking
6
Distinct tracked authors
posts mentioning it
6
In the selected period
vs. the previous 24 hours
+100%
Observed 97% now, 100% prior
reported switching to it
—
Needs three supporting authors
Attention over time
Posts / hour
02:0106:0010:0014:0018:0022:0002:00
Mentions in our tracked network, per hourStill collecting
Collection is incomplete. Breaks in the line are unobserved intervals, not zero mentions.
View interval counts
Interval start (UTC)
Mentions
Coverage
2026-09-25 03:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 04:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 05:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 06:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 07:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 08:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 09:00 UTC
1
Complete
2026-09-25 10:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 11:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 12:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 13:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 14:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 15:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 16:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 17:00 UTC
1
Complete
2026-09-25 18:00 UTC
2
Complete
2026-09-25 19:00 UTC
1
Partial
2026-09-25 20:00 UTC
0
Partial
2026-09-25 21:00 UTC
1
Complete
2026-09-25 22:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-25 23:00 UTC
0
Complete
2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
0
Partial
3 unobserved intervals omitted. We did not collect during them, so their counts are unknown, not zero.
What people are saying
Grounded in source posts
Getting praise
No supported praise from at least three authors in this window.
Raising concerns
No supported concerns from at least three authors in this window.
Tone of the conversation
Not enough classified posts for a breakdown. Percentages need at least 10 labelled posts from 5 authors.
Posts labelled
6 of 6
Collection coverage
97%
How this is put together
Public posts from the accounts Tech Twitter monitors, in the selected window. Findings need three supporting authors and a published source. Announcements can cite one known-affiliated account. This is a sample of the conversation, not a survey or a measure of adoption.
The posts behind the picture
Public source posts
@mtslive
Bright AI Future founder @OfficialBBrooks predicts open-weight AI becomes the default for regular people once running it locally stops costing $6,000:
"I love what NVIDIA's doing. All of these models that are starting to come out that aren't led by frontier labs, I think will eventually end up winning all of this."
"The big thing they're concerned about outside of costs is privacy. They've conflated all this with Flock cameras, for example, and a lot of people are against them, both sides of the aisle. When you can have it running locally for yourself, that's such a huge advantage."
"As of today, it's too expensive. I looked at a DGX Spark from NVIDIA, and it was like $6,000. The average person can't afford that, so of course they're gonna pay the $20 Claude subscription or OpenAI subscription."
"The frontier labs are going to absolutely find their place. But the average person, and the average small business, are gonna really get into using these open weight models."
We're helping world-class organizations like @klaviyo build agentic deployment platforms.
① Connect every agent (claude, codex, cursor…)
② Configure SSO via their IDP (Okta, Entra)
③ Now everyone can cook, securely®
What happens to SaaS once every company sets this up? I get this question a lot 😁
First, the data must come from somewhere. These apps only work if they can be infused with business data.
This is why we see the big enterprise SaaS players suddenly prioritize shipping CLIs and MCPs. Or dust off APIs they were neglecting for years.
The new 'procurement bar' will be how ergonomic your product is for *agents*, rather than humans. How easily they can navigate your ontology and work with your data.
Once that's in place, there's a long tail of SaaS applications that I suspect will never be bought again. They'll be generated. They'll be more secure, more performant, more modern, and tailored to each company's and employee's needs.
What are specific requests in Claude Computer/Browser Use that have failed for you? We want to fix.
An example for me is:
"pay my barber $40 through my personal paypal"
(where paypal is logged into my 2nd chrome profile, I'm logged out but password is saved)
From the guest post by Matt von Hippel who issued the challenge:
'Things definitely seem to be moving fast. In March, AI was accomplishing physics projects like a student: smaller-scale tasks with a lot of hand-holding and mistakes. In contrast, this is a real frontier calculation, the kind of thing normally tackled by the top experts in amplitudes.'
Jev can't write a single word, which is exactly why it should pick what my agents read
my Obsidian vaults hold 5k+ notes, one idea per note, each with a one-line summary in an index
but Claude can't read all of that on every turn, and a keyword search misses the note that makes the same point in different words
so Jev does the picking:
> step 1: Jev reads the 28 vault descriptions and picks where the task belongs
> step 2: it checks every note summary in that vault in one call, each judged alone
> step 3: the top 5 come back with full text - Jev drops any that miss the task
> step 4: my code loads the survivors into Claude's context (and nothing else)
every pick comes from a list i define, so Jev can't invent a note
the worst it can do is pick the wrong one... and each one carries a confidence score that tells my code when to fall back to Claude
"The future of pharma will not come out of the pharma labs, but tech labs..."
Serial pharma entrepreneur Dr Clemens Fischer (FUTRUE Founder and CEO) says bureaucracy holds traditional companies back:
"We do not have any company which has more than 180 employees."
"The more people you have, the more bureaucracy you have, the more problems you have."
"Every time we reach about 170, 180 employees, we just cut and start a new section."
"I think the future of pharma will not come out of the pharma labs, but tech labs, even the small tech labs."
"I think the really efficient companies are really small, no bureaucracy, and in the best way, even no investors."