i can tell who’s still using opus 5 for their linkedin cringe posts. please spare my eyeballs, opus 5.5 is here
Finding signal on Twitter is more difficult than it used to be. We curate the best tweets on topics like AI, startups, and product development every weekday so you can focus on what matters.
frontier modelby Anthropic
We collected 5 eligible posts, but not enough supported labels from different authors to summarise the conversation.
Collection is incomplete. Breaks in the line are unobserved intervals, not zero mentions.
| Interval start (UTC) | Mentions | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-25 01:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 02:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 03:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 04:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 05:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 06:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 07:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 08:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 09:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 10:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 11:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 12:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 13:00 UTC | 1 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 14:00 UTC | 1 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 15:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 16:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 17:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 18:00 UTC | 2 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 19:00 UTC | 0 | Partial |
| 2026-09-25 20:00 UTC | 0 | Partial |
| 2026-09-25 21:00 UTC | 0 | Complete |
| 2026-09-25 22:00 UTC | 1 | Complete |
3 unobserved intervals omitted. We did not collect during them, so their counts are unknown, not zero.
No supported praise from at least three authors in this window.
No supported concerns from at least three authors in this window.
Not enough classified posts for a breakdown. Percentages need at least 10 labelled posts from 5 authors.
Public posts from the accounts Tech Twitter monitors, in the selected window. Findings need three supporting authors and a published source. Announcements can cite one known-affiliated account. This is a sample of the conversation, not a survey or a measure of adoption.
i can tell who’s still using opus 5 for their linkedin cringe posts. please spare my eyeballs, opus 5.5 is here
Opus 5.5 got my ts-rust port working in 10 hours, and it has been grinding on performance for the last 24 hours. I've been working on this port on and off for about 4 months. I got to ~35% tests passing with GPT-5.6 Sol, and ~85% with GPT-6 Astra. Both models stalled hard once hitting those numbers, and ran in loops with no meaningful progress for days at a time. I've never had "enough Anthropic tokens" to try a Claude model on a port like this. Opus 5.5 feels practically unlimited, so I threw it a "/goal finish the port and make it faster". I can not believe how quickly Opus unblocked the work Astra was stuck on. It may have made this port an actually viable project. Absolutely mind blown right now.
Holy shit, Claude Opus 5.5 is now up to 40% cheaper than Opus 5. Same tasks. Same quality. Way less cost. Breakdown: Input tokens: $4/M (down 20%) Output tokens: $20/M (down 20%) Cache reads: $0.20/M (down 60%) Most of a coding session's cost comes from cache reads, so this alone can cut your bill by more than half. AI is slowly getting cheaper.
Opus 5.5 is the best model launch of the year for me... it couldn't have been better the timing was impeccable, they basically made the GPT-6 releases pointless because this is what we're getting: - better, faster and cheaper than Fable 5.1 - with the same feeling Fable had, the one that made it so good to work with - cheap enough to actually run in prod - limits that aren't that bad anymore so a lot more people can afford it now, which genuinely opens up use cases that were out of reach before they put OpenAI on silent mode for a few days with this one
opus 5.5 is truly the best model we've ever had i can't wait for anthropic to nerf it