Press Space to continue
Finding signal on Twitter is more difficult than it used to be. We curate the best tweets on topics like AI, startups, and product development every weekday so you can focus on what matters.
Press Space to continue
Press Space to continue
Should you build an agent harness? I see lots of opinions about it. My thoughts: As an AI engineer, learning how to build a harness is one of the best ways to stay ahead and unlock unique value from agents. If you understand how to build one, you can, at a minimum, transfer that knowledge to tune whatever harness or set of harnesses (closed or open) you use. In the best case, you apply your domain expertise to build domain-specific harnesses that unlock unique real-world value and solve…
Learn to build a harness, folks. It's not surprising to me that so many YC builders want to build domain-specific harnesses. If you work long enough on a domain-specific problem, you quickly realize the opportunity. But you also realize how important that harness will be to stay competitive in the agentic era. From a product perspective, harnesses open up interesting new surface areas and experiences for the services/products you provide. From a technical perspective, harnesses are how you build and maintain a framework and set of best practices for how your users/customers interact with what you offer. Understanding how to build and design a harness means you can build much stronger intelligence stacks, given that you can customize it and understand the domain well. That's extremely valuable. It may not seem apparent yet, but a harness wave is coming. If you are getting started, give this list of harness papers to your agents and start upskilling: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/collections/harness-engineering If you are already a builder, try building one for your specific domain. It's a lot of fun, and you learn a lot of interesting things to enhance your current agentic tools.