Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science

Press Space to continue

Exactly! Let’s attack the safety problem with rigorous science and engineering. Great to see Jensen and more recently Mark bring some sense into this conversation. Not sure how we have allowed this alignment stuff to become so political and sci-fi. We need to go back to fundamentals. If your model or AI product by extension is unsafe/defective, it’s your responsibility to fix it.

davidsacks@davidsacks4h ago

Jensen Huang: “Safety is paramount. In a lot of ways, it’s job one. However, safety is an engineering problem... If we’re not confident about the safety of the products — like all companies, like you and I, all the companies here — if you build a product or a service and you’re not confident in its functionality, capability, or safety, then don’t release it. That’s a very obvious thing to do. You pace yourself until you are confident you’re releasing something that the market would appreciate. The market forces are already there. We don’t need any new laws. We don’t need new regulations.” https://t.co/5Lz4RIQbtV