Press Space to continue
Finding signal on Twitter is more difficult than it used to be. We curate the best tweets on topics like AI, startups, and product development every weekday so you can focus on what matters.
Press Space to continue
Press Space to continue
Manhattan Institute's @judgeglock explains how tort law would handle the Hugging Face incident, and why no actual damages means no tort case: "We often have in our study criminal liability in addition to tort and other sorts of civil liability. In this case, the supposed criminal law they were breaking was the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, first passed in the 1980s, and then again in 1996. This unauthorized use of a computer would be a criminal sanction under typical federal law." "Whatever…
People treat AI alignment like it's only a technical problem. Yet it's mainly an incentive issue. The way to get AI aligned is to align the interests of AI labs with the public. On @CityJournal SS, I argue torts do that better than bureaucracy. https://t.co/elUwqmK0gJ